Legal Opinion

Garland Community Hospital v. Rose

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 2004No. 02-0902PublishedCited by 224 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

This action derives from Debi Rose’s (“Rose”) claim that Garland Community Hospital (“the Hospital”) negligently credentialed a doctor who performed cosmetic surgery on Rose. We must decide whether a negligent credentialing claim is a health care liability claim as defined in the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act (“MLIIA”). 1 Act of May 30, 1977, 65th Leg., R.S., ch. 817, §§ 1.01-12.01 1977 Tex. Gen. Laws 2039-2053 (former Tex. Rev.Civ. Stat. art. 4590i), repealed by Act of June 2, 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 204, § 10.09, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws 847, 884. 2 The trial court ruled that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital v. AgborTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Baptist Memorial Hospital System v. SampsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sorokolit v. RhodesTexas Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by224 opinions

  1. Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Murphy v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Yamada v. FriendTexas Supreme Court · 2010

219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API