Legal Opinion
Odum v. Adkins
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
On October 22, 1930, complainant purchased two mules from defendant Kate Adkins, for which he paid $100 in cash and executed and delivered to her the following note:
“$100.00
“On Nov. 15, 1931, B. P. Odum promise to pay Kate Adkins One hundred dollars balance on one pair of mules. Kate Adkins retains a title on mules until paid for. This 22 of Oct. 1930, at 6 per cent interest.
“B. P. Odum.”
The bill was filed for the purpose of enjoining defendant Kate Adkins from instituting and prosecuting a re-plevin suit for said mules, upon allegations of breach of warranty as to soundness, and because of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rogers v. WhitneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Ashley and Gibbs v. PrestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Star Clothing Manufacturing Co. v. NordemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Marchand v. RonaghanIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Kenner & Co. v. PetersTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Taylor v. Ressler Leather Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936