Legal Opinion

O'Hanlon Reports, Inc. v. Needles

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1962No. 31012PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs O’Hanlon Reports, Inc. and National Inspection Bureau, the joint employers of one Lawrence E. Rosebrock, and Standard Accident Insurance Company, their workmen’s compensation insurer, seek by this action to enforce an alleged right of subrogation against the third party tort-feasor and his liability insurer. After the jury had been impaneled and plaintiffs had concluded their opening statement, defendants moved that plaintiffs’ claim be dismissed for the reason that under the facts outlined in the opening statement no cause of action existed against…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. McDonnell Aircraft Corp. v. Hartman-Hanks-Walsh Painting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChumbleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Kinney v. SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Transit Casualty Co. v. HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Tillman v. Cam's Trucking, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Kirtley v. IreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API