Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Leslie

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 9, 1950No. 41765PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

232 S.W.2d 913 (1950)

SCHUMACHER

v.

LESLIE.

No. 41765.

Supreme Court of Missouri, en Banc.

October 9, 1950.

Orr, Pflager, Foulis & Andreas, St. Louis, for appellant.

Doris J. Banta, Carter, Bull & McNulty, St. Louis, for respondent.

BOHLING, Commissioner.

Jacob E. Schumacher sued C. H. Leslie, a physician for $10,420 damages for alleged malpractice. Cast on defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim against defendant, plaintiff has appealed. Plaintiff says the question is whether an employee, covered by the Workmen's Compensation Act, who has sustained a compensable injury under said…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Sylcox v. National Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. General Box Co. v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. Iowa Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick TerrioSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. John M. Hoppe v. Midwest Conveyor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. Tauchert v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API