Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision setting his parole release date to follow 240 months of incarceration. He argues that the Board violated the ex post facto provisions of the Oregon1 and United States2 Constitutions by setting his parole release date under rules that were not in effect when he committed his offenses. Petitioner also contends that the Board’s use of his juvenile adjudications in calculating his criminal history violated the ex post facto provisions because, at the time that he committed his offenses, the Board was not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Roof v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Glasser v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Hill v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meadows v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996