Glasser v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order granting him a four-month reduction of his prison term. He argues that the Board’s order violated the ex post facto provisions of the state 1 and federal 2 constitutions. We affirm.
In 1984, petitioner was sentenced to life in prison for murder. The Board set his prison term at 168 months, subject to reduction at periodic hearings. Following a hearing on June 24, 1992, the Board reduced petitioner’s sentence by four months pursuant to OAR 255-40-025, as amended in 1988. The Board then granted reconsideration, revoked its prior order, and,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Jeldness v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Jeldness v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Rise v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dawson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Cornell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Donald Edward Cornell v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996