Legal Opinion

Glasser v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 1993No. CA A76245PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order granting him a four-month reduction of his prison term. He argues that the Board’s order violated the ex post facto provisions of the state 1 and federal 2 constitutions. We affirm.

In 1984, petitioner was sentenced to life in prison for murder. The Board set his prison term at 168 months, subject to reduction at periodic hearings. Following a hearing on June 24, 1992, the Board reduced petitioner’s sentence by four months pursuant to OAR 255-40-025, as amended in 1988. The Board then granted reconsideration, revoked its prior order, and,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Jeldness v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Jeldness v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Rise v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Cornell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Donald Edward Cornell v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API