Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. State Tax Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2008No. Docket 133394, 133396, 133400 to 133406PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

These consolidated appeals concern a tax exemption that aims to improve Michigan’s environment by encouraging entities to reduce air pollution they create in Michigan. Based on the plain language of the statute, we hold that in order to for equipment to be exempt, it must be installed or acquired for the primary purpose of regulating or curbing the spread of pollution in Michigan. Further, the equipment must actually and physically limit pollution. None of the equipment that is the subject of this appeal meets these tests. Therefore, the Court of Appeals erred by partially overturning the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Grimes v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wexford Medical Group v. City of CadillacMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Covert Township Assessor v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Sterling Heights v. Chrysler Group, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Franz v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. City of Sterling Heights v. Chrysler Group, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API