Petersen v. Magna Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentMarkman, J.
Because I disagree with the majority interpretation of the statute in controversy, MCL 418.315, I respectfully dissent.1
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, a truck driver, fell off his truck and injured his back while working. He sought workers’ compensation benefits under the Worker’s Disability Compensation *351Act (WDCA), MCL 418.101 et seq. The magistrate granted benefits and medical costs to plaintiff, and also imposed $46,034 against defendants for plaintiffs attorney fees pursuant to MCL 418.315(1).2 The Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) affirmed.
The Court of Appeals initially denied…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.