United States v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
The Government here appeals the dismissal of an indictment alleging criminal extortion by a local public official under the Hobbs Act. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1951. The district court held the statute unconstitutionally vague and, alternatively, held that proof of coercion is necessary to sustain a conviction for extortion under the Act. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 1951(a), (b)(1). We reverse the district court on both of these holdings, and order that the jury verdict of guilty be reinstated.
Procedurally, defendant, an elected member of the school board for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Phillip TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Rafael RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Gilbert L. DozierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.