Legal Opinion
In Re Wilson
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 20, 1993No. Bankruptcy 2-91-05455PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO MODIFY PLAN
BARBARA J. SELLERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Preliminary Matters
This matter is a core proceeding which is before the Court on a motion by the Chap ter 13 trustee (“Trustee”) seeking to modify a confirmed plan. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (L) & (0).
The debtor, Nina Wilson, has a Chapter 13 plan which was confirmed by the Court on September 16, 1991. In March, 1993, the Trustee learned that one of the major debts under the plan had been paid by the debtor’s non-filing spouse from whom she was separated. The Trustee moved to modify the plan to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- In Re EuerleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987
- In Re FitakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- In Re KoonceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
- In Re GronskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Max Recovery, Inc. v. Nguyen Hong Than (In Re Nguyen Hong Than)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ledford v. Brown (In Re Brown)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- In Re KlusUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- In Re EulerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.