Max Recovery, Inc. v. Nguyen Hong Than (In Re Nguyen Hong Than)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
OLLASON, Bankruptcy Judge.
OVERVIEW
Max Recovery, Inc. (“Appellant”) is a collection agency and posteonfirmation assignee of unsecured creditors’ claims in Nguyen Hong Than’s (“Than”) Chapter 13 bankrupt cy case. 1 No creditor opposed confirmation of Than’s percentage plan. When fewer claims than anticipated were filed, the Chapter 13 trustee noticed interested parties that Than’s plan would be completed in 32 months instead of the original estimate of 38 months. Appellant sought to increase the plan duration to at least 36 months, thus requiring a larger payout to the unsecured…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Lawrence Tractor Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Barbosa v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- John H. Germeraad v. Myrick J. PowersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- In Re BarbosaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Law Offices of Neil Vincent Wake v. Sedona Institute (In Re Sedona Institute)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.