Legal Opinion
In Re Klus
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 13, 1994No. 19-20173PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION TO MODIFY PLAN AFTER CONFIRMATION
ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
The movant, Keycorp Mortgage Inc., seeks to modify the debtors’ confirmed chapter 13 plan so that its claim will be treated as fully secured, rather than secured in part and unsecured in part. 1 For the reasons that follow, I conclude that Keycorp’s motion must be denied.
BACKGROUND
The debtors commenced this chapter 13 case on January 9,1992. On March 16,1992, the debtors filed a Motion to Determine Status and Amount of Creditor’s Claim (the “506(a) Motion”) 2 which alleged that the debtor’s…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In Re William FESQ, Debtor. BRANCHBURG PLAZA ASSOCIATES, L.P., Appellant, v. William FESQCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Sanchez v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Sanchez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re BarbosaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- In Re MeeksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.