Legal Opinion

In re Kinney

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided May 26, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This was a petition by W. Frank Kinney, collector of internal revenue, to the district judge, asking the issuance of an attachment for contempt.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWK, District Judge.

The collector’s petition, addressed to the district judge, represents the refusal of Frank M. Maihewson, president of the Oakdale Manufacturing Company (a corporation engaged in the manufacture of oleomargarine), to obey a summons issued by the collector under section 3173 of the Revised Statutes, i and prays that, in accordance with the provisions of section 3175 of the Revised Statutes, “an attachment may issue against the said Frank M. Mathewson, directed to the United States marshal of said district, commanding him to arrest said Frank M. Mathewson, and bring him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Cotton v. DaceyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1894
  4. The ArcherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1878
  5. Wells v. ShookU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schafer v. CraftDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1906
  2. Grier v. TuckerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1907
  3. Tucker v. GrierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. United States v. LamsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1908
  5. Craft v. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API