Legal Opinion

Craft v. Schafer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1907No. 1,589PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

This is one of a number of actions brought to recover back the taxes and penalties assessed and paid under what are known as the '‘Oleomargarine Acts.” Retail dealers of oleomargarine are required to pay a special tax of $18 per year; but, if the oleomargarine be free from any artificial coloration which causes it to look like butter of any shade of’yellow, the annual tax is only $6. In the present cases it was held, as a matter of fact, that the oleomargarine .sold was artificially colored, and therefore subject to the special tax o,f $48 per year. The internal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re KinneyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1900
  2. In re KearnsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. United States v. LamsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1908
  3. Craft v. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API