Legal Opinion

The Archer

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[In admiralty. For a subsequent hearing in this case on motion to take out of registry the proceeds of sale of the vessel upon giving the customary bond, see The Archer,. Case No. 508.]

1Opinion of the Court

CHOATE, District Judge.

This is a libel on a bottomry bond against vessel, cargo, and freight. The vessel, cargo, and freight having been attached, and claimants having appeared for vessel and freight and also for cargo, the claimant of the cargo now moves to be allowed, on paying the freight into court, to bond the cargo for its value in this port, less the freight. The claimant of the vessel consents; the libellant objects. The ground of the motion is that the extreme interest of the owner of the cargo *1088in the cargo, on which the libellant can have obtained security by the bottomry bond, is…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Transportes Navieros Y Terrestres S.A. De C v. v. Fairmount Heavy Transport N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. In re KinneyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1900
  3. The Two MarysDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API