Legal Opinion

United States v. Lamson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided November 5, 1908No. 2,624PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On Motion to Quash Indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

This is a motion to quash an indictment under section 5392, Rev.'St. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3653), for perjury in making false returns under the oleomargarine law.

By Act of May 9, 1902, c. 784, § 6, 32 Stat. 197 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 641), it is provided;

“Sec. 6. That wholesale dealers in oleomargarine, process, renovated, or adulterated butter shall keep such books and render such returns in relation thereto as the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, may, by regulation, require; and such books shall be open…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  4. United States v. United Verde Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. United States v. MaidDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. IngelsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. United States v. CameronDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1922
  3. Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API