Legal Opinion

Reed v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1957No. Civ. 9253PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant after the trial court had sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. The complaint alleged that plaintiff, a married woman, sustained injuries, suffered severe emotional strain, mental shock and fright, followed by physical injury in the form of a miscarriage as the direct and proximate result from plaintiff being an eyewitness to a collision between an automobile in which her husband was riding and an automobile driven by defendant, the collision being caused by defendant’s negligence. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Lindley v. KnowltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Easton v. United Trade Sch. Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Kelly v. FretzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Santa Barbara Pistachio Ranch v. Chowchilla Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Hopper v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API