Lindley v. Knowlton
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
O. P. Bindley and his wife, Lillian S. Bindley, sued defendant for damages on account of personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained by Mrs. Bindley because of fright occasioned by the appearance and acts of a chimpanzee owned by Knowlton. The complaint contained allegations that the animal was so negligently kept by defendant that it escaped from restraint and entered the dwelling-house of plaintiffs, where Mrs. Bindley and her two little children were at the time; that it attacked the* two children successively, choking one of them severely; that the mother successfully, though with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Easton v. United Trade Sch. Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3Cited by31 opinions
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.