Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Western Pacific Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1966PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The trial court sustained one defendant’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint and granted the other defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; therefore, the nature of this proceeding and the facts must be found from the pleadings.

Plaintiffs’ complaint reasonably can be construed as alleging as follows: The Agency agreed to write $10,000 fire insurance coverage upon plaintiffs’ house; the Agency wrote such a policy for plaintiffs in the defendant Insurance Company, but without notice to plaintiffs that such policy included a provision that the $10,000 coverage was conditioned upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Elam v. Smithdeal Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Elam v. . Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Jernigan v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hamacher v. TUMYOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aden v. FortshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. Campione v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Havas v. CarterNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lawrence v. PeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Kabban v. MacKinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API