Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Mid-West Painting, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 2000No. 79,833PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

Richard H. Frazier petitions this court for review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming the Workers Compensation Board’s (Board) denial of benefits for permanent aggravation of claimant’s preexisting back injury. The question we must resolve is whether the back injury which occurred during treatment for claimant’s primary injury to his right forearm and shoulder was a natural and probable result of the primary injury. We conclude that it was and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Claimant was employed as a painter and drywall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Roberts v. KrupkaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Helms v. Tollie Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. Quinones v. MBPXL CORP.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Casco v. ARMOUR SWIFT-ECHRICHCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  4. Casey v. Dillon Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  5. Logsdon v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API