Legal Opinion

Casco v. ARMOUR SWIFT-ECHRICH

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 19, 2005No. 93,984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

We are asked to decide in this case if Alejandro Casco should receive either workers compensation for a permanent partial general disability or compensation for two separate scheduled injuries. Casco, from repetitive work, first hurt his left shoulder and then, because he was compensating for that injury, his right shoulder hurt from overuse. We reverse and remand to the Workers Compensation Board (Board) with directions to resolve the issue of work disability.

Work and Injury History

Casco’s employment with the defendant required him to perform repetitive work with both of his upper…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Stevens Well ServiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Nance v. Harvey CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. Depew v. NCR Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Stockman v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Mitchell v. Petsmart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  3. Goodell v. TYSON FRESH MEATSCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API