Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Krupka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 13, 1990No. 63,171PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

Hizey Well Service and Supply (employer) and U.S.F.&G. Insurance Company (workers compensation insurer) appeal from the decision of the district court denying their motion to intervene in the medical malpractice action brought by David E. Roberts (employee) against John J. Krupka (physician) and other health care providers. The Court of Appeals reversed the district court (Roberts v. Krupka, 13 Kan. App. 2d 691, 779 P.2d 447 [1989]). The matter is before us on petition for review.

On November 2, 1982, Roberts and other Hizey employees were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of City of Shawnee for Annexation of LandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Jackson v. Stevens Well ServiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  3. Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Ruth v. Witherspoon-Englar Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Roan Eagle v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Smith v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Helms v. Tollie Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. Foveaux v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API