Quinones v. MBPXL CORP.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Abbott, J.:
The claimant, Hector Quinones, appeals from a judgment in a workers’ compensation case which held that the loss of sensation in his left lower extremity is not compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
The dispositive facts are simple and are largely undisputed. Claimant’s right arm was caught by two meat hooks and pulled into a machine, causing injuries that are not in question on appeal. In an attempt to restore maximum use and an ability to feel in the injured hand and arm, a nerve was transplanted from claimant’s left leg.
As a result of the nerve’s being removed,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anderson v. Kinsley Sand & Gravel, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Duncan v. W. M. Davidson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Gross v. Herb Lungren Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frazier v. Mid-West Painting, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Rodriguez v. Henkle Drilling & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
- McLaughlin v. Excel Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989