Legal Opinion

State v. Hartman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1941No. 6366PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Chief Justice.

Roy Hartman and Orson Blyle were charged with the crime of grand larceny in an information which read as follows:

“The Defendants, Roy Hartman and Orson Blyle, having been heretofore duly committed to this Court by B. P. Leverich, a committing magistrate of Salt Lake County, State of Utah, to answer to this charge, are accused by Calvin W. Rawlings, District Attorney of the Third Judicial District, State of Utah, by this Information, of the crime of Grand Larceny, committed as follows, to wit: That the said Roy Hartman and Orson Blyle on the 16th day of May, A. D., 1940,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FreshwaterUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. LeekUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. FaircloughUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. CrevistonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. St. ClairUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. MathisUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. ArchulettaUtah Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API