Hyde v. Scott
New York Supreme Court
Motion to -direct a witness t,o answer certain interrogatories under a subpoena issued under section 915 of the Code of Civil Procedure and a motion to1 vacate the subpoena.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabuby, J.
Two motions are now before the court. • One motion is made to compel J ames McNaught to answer certain interrogatories under a subpoena, and the other motion is made by McNaught to vacate the subpoena. The Great Northern Construction Company, on March 22, 1899, entered into a contract with the Great Northern railway of Canada to construct and equip a portion of the line of the railway company in- the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec, and at the same time entered into a contract with á copart*489nership doing business under the name of ¡Ross, Barry & McRae, under which contract the copartnership…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Great Northern Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Application for a Subpœna Directed to RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- People ex rel. Ickes v. RushworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1920