Legal Opinion

In re the Application for a Subpœna Directed to Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 30, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

Petitioner claims that prior to April, 1924, Walter S. Roberts, one of the respondent witnesses, and a New York corporation which it is claimed he had caused to be formed, known as the Aracoma Textile Co., Inc., were and still are indebted to the Commercial Credit Company, petitioner, appellant, a Delaware corporation, in an amount in excess of $22,000; that in April, 1924, the petitioner, becoming possessed of information which led it to believe that Roberts and the Aracoma Company had property in the State of Rhode Island sufficient to respond to its $22,000 claim, caused an action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guenther v. Ridgway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. In Re Proceedings Against SearlsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. In re the Application to Compel Randal to Produce Certain Books, Papers & Records of the Western Gas & Fuel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. In re RandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. In re CanterNew York Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of CepedaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  2. Ayliffe and Companies v. Canadian Universal Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. In re Franklin Washington Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Walsh v. HerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In re the Issuance of Subpœnas Directed to TopliffeNew York Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API