In re Great Northern Construction Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion to compel the production of certain "books and documents, and to vacate a subpoena duces tecum.
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
In this proceeding two motions, arising from the same facts, involving the same issues and treated together by counsel, are presented to the court. One, under sections 914 and 915 of the Code, by a commissioner, under a commission from the Superior Court for Lower Canada, issued at the instance of the above-named liquidator, and in aid of which a subpcena duces tecum was issued by this court, to compel a witness, an officer of said company, to answer certain questions propounded to him, and to produce certain books and documents of said company, which he has refused to answer and produce…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Ferguson v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Hyde v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1912