Legal Opinion
Crown MacHine & Tool Co. v. K v P-Sutherland Paper Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 29, 1968No. 42224PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SWEIGERT, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action brought by plaintiff Crown Machine & Tool Co., (hereinafter “Crown”) against defendant KVP-Sutherland Co., (hereinafter “Sutherland”). Defendant Sutherland has counterclaimed for violation of the antitrust laws. Jurisdiction of the patent action is founded upon 62 Stat. 931 (1948), 28 U.S.C. § 1338 (1964).
The case is presently before the Court after a trial of the issues and extensive post-trial briefing. The Court has also had the benefit of its extensive and fairly well detailed notes made during the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Cataphote Corporation v. Desoto Chemical Coatings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1975
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.