Nash v. Rosesteel
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages resulting from alleged false and fraudulent representations made by defendant to the plaintiff, whereby the latter was induced to buy certain corporate stock. At the time of the transaction complained of the United Wholesale Grocery Company was a corporation engaged in the wholesale grocery business, having an outstanding capital of $116,000, divided into eleven hundred and sixty shares of the par value of $100 each. Defendant owned three hundred shares of this stock and held the position of president of the company. Negotiations were entered into by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Scott v. DepeysterNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
- South San Bernardino Land & Improvement Co. v. San Bernardino National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Baldwin v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Merker v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Edwards v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Smeland v. RenwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bank of St. Helena v. Lilienthal-Brayton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Nunemacher v. Western Motor Transport Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.