Bank of St. Helena v. Lilienthal-Brayton Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
Appeal from judgment in favor of defendants entered pursuant to a verdict of a jury, which verdict was directed by the court upon the theory that plaintiff had failed to present facts sufficient to sustain its cause of action.
The action was one to recover damages resulting to plaintiff from and through the fraud of defendants, and a narrative of the facts may be here given.
The plaintiff is a banking corporation with its place of business at St. Helena in Napa County, California. The defendants as partners are engaged in a general brokerage business, consisting in part in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunter v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Nash v. RosesteelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Ward v. McVickerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- McLaughlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Freese v. LemmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- In Re Easysaver Rewards LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Slakey Brothers Sacramento, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.