Legal Opinion

People v. Albritton

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1930No. Docket No. 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

By an information filed in the superior court, three men named respectively Albritton, Smith and Shiraishi were charged with the commission by them of the crime of murder. In the same information the defendant Shiraishi was also charged with the commission of a prior felony. Shortly, following the date of the arraignment of the three defendants, Shiraishi presented a motion that he be granted a trial separate from either or both of his co-defendants—which motion was by the court denied. Two days after the trial of all the defendants had commenced, Albritton and Smith each withdrew his former…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. BossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. DowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. HardemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. CorkeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. FitzwaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API