Legal Opinion

People v. Corkery

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1933No. Docket No. 2398PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime of robbery, as well as from the order by which his motion for a new trial was denied.

Omitting unnecessary details which relate to the facts and circumstances that are connected with the robbery in question, it appears that in the course of its perpetration by defendant and another man, after one of the two victims had surrendered certain personal property to defendant’s companion in the crime, one of the said victims screamed for help, whereupon both the robbers started to leave the scene of the robbery and appellant did immediately…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. People v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Commonwealth v. DorisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. State v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. State v. ForshaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. BuonoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API