Legal Opinion

Goetz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1966PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

A quite similar fact situation was presented by plaintiffs’ counsel in the case of Hansen v. Firemen’s Insurance of Newark (1963), 21 Wis. (2d) 137, 124 N. W. (2d) 81, and he strenuously argues the language of that case is controlling here. The particular language relied on is, “If Mr. Hansen or his attorney were delayed in making a timely investigation of the factual circumstances of the accident by reason of the inducement contained in the defendant’s promise, a valid cause of action might be asserted.” While the plaintiffs have incorporated part of this language verbatim in their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Will v. JessenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hansen v. Firemen's Insurance of NewarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Estate of Bogley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Beverage Distributors, Inc., a Corporation v. Olympia Brewing Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Wickenhauser v. LehtinenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Berg v. ObamaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Pappas v. BeverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API