Legal Opinion
Berg v. Obama
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 24, 2008No. Civil Action 08-4083PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
SURRICK, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the Motion of Defendant Democratic National Committee and Senator Barack Obama to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 20) and the Defendant Federal Election Commission’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 24). For the following reasons, the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be granted.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
Philip J. Berg (hereinafter “Plaintiff’) is an attorney who is representing himself in this matter. On August 21, 2008, just prior to the Democratic National…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Zaslow v. ColemanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012
- Williams v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Sweigert v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Hollister v. SoetoroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.