Legal Opinion
Scherr Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 28, 1992No. 90-554CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiff’s application for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b) (1988), incurred in litigation against the Government in a contract dispute. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed. On June 21, 1990, Scherr Construction Compa*249ny (“plaintiff”) filed a complaint requesting relief from the United States Department of Agriculture—Soil Conservation Service’s (the “USDA”) partial termination and then final termination for convenience of Contract No. 50-6633-7-49.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Naporano Iron and Metal Company, Andrew J. Naporano and Beatrice Naporano, Andrew J. Naporano and Sharon Naporano v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Levernier Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- The City of Brunswick, Georgia, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Levernier Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- California Marine Cleaning, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Al Ghanim Combined Group Co. Gen. Trad. & Cont. W.L.L. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- KMS Fusion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.