Legal Opinion

Langley ex rel. Hillenbrand v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1958No. 8603PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

Appellant, Consolidated Freightways, Inc., conducts a freightline business in many western and mid-western states, including the states of Washington, Oregon and Idaho. A substantial part of its business is carried on in Idaho where it has *471several freight terminals. About ten years prior to 1956, one Wendell Hillenbrand was employed by the Consolidated Freightways, Inc., in the State of Washington as an assistant terminal manager. On July 1, 1956, he was transferred to Portland, Oregon. On August 10, 1956, he was sent to Ontario, Oregon, to relieve the terminal manager at that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Boyle v. G. & K. TRUCKING CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  3. In Re HillenbrandIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Clark v. SageIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Davis v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API