Legal Opinion
Davis v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 30, 1968No. Civ. No. 67-234PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KILKENNY, District Judge:
Defendants’ motion for a summary judgment is grounded on the theory that plaintiff’s reme'dy, if any, is under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the state of Idaho and that this remedy is exclusive. The governing principle, as I view it, is whether Oregon or Idaho law should be applied. Plaintiff is a citizen of Oregon. Defendants are nonresidents of this state, but do business herein.
Defendants hired plaintiff in Oregon on August 16, 1965, to operate a Caterpillar dump truck at the Hell’s Canyon Dam site on the Snake River between Oregon and Idaho. He was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Wilson v. FaullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Crider v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Saharceski v. MarcureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Garcia v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Edmunds v. EdmundsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972
- Garcia v. American AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993