Legal Opinion

Hatgimisios v. Dave's N.E. Mint, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1977No. 2092PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

Appellant sued appellee in replevin. When appellee failed to answer interrogatories, appellant, acting under Philadelphia Civil Rule 4005*(d), 1 took default judgment. The lower court granted appellee’s petition to open the judgment, and this appeal followed.

Opening a default judgment is a matter of judicial discretion. That discretion, however, is to be exercised only if three requirements are first met: (1) the petition to open has been promptly filed; (2) a legitimate explanation exists for the delay that prompted the default judgment; and (3) a meritorious defense is…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Schutte v. Valley Bargain Center, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Kros v. Bacall Textile Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Texas & Block House Fish & Game Club v. Bonnell Run Hunting & Fishing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Strickler v. United Elevator Co. (Inc.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Madrid v. ALPINE MOUNTAIN CORP.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Allegheny Hydro No. 1 v. American Line Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Toczylowski v. General Bindery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Butterbaugh v. Westons Shopper City, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API