Hatgimisios v. Dave's N.E. Mint, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
Appellant sued appellee in replevin. When appellee failed to answer interrogatories, appellant, acting under Philadelphia Civil Rule 4005*(d), 1 took default judgment. The lower court granted appellee’s petition to open the judgment, and this appeal followed.
Opening a default judgment is a matter of judicial discretion. That discretion, however, is to be exercised only if three requirements are first met: (1) the petition to open has been promptly filed; (2) a legitimate explanation exists for the delay that prompted the default judgment; and (3) a meritorious defense is…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Schutte v. Valley Bargain Center, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Kros v. Bacall Textile Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Texas & Block House Fish & Game Club v. Bonnell Run Hunting & Fishing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Strickler v. United Elevator Co. (Inc.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Madrid v. ALPINE MOUNTAIN CORP.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Allegheny Hydro No. 1 v. American Line Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Toczylowski v. General Bindery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Butterbaugh v. Westons Shopper City, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.