Legal Opinion

Smart v. Valencia

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1926No. 2728PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

If record contains amended complaint, original should be omitted. Page v. Walser, 46 Nev. 390.

Judgment must correspond with pleadings. Objection that judgment is not authorized by pleadings may be taken upon judgment roll alone. Frevert v. Henry, 14 Nev. 191.

There can be no recovery of part of consideration paid under entire or completed contract. Benjamin, Sales (7th ed.), 394.

Relief is afforded one who has paid more than he should by action for damages for breach of contract, or for rescission upon restoration of what he has received. Second Hand Supply Co. v. Boyd, 123 P. 619.

Mutual…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bearman v. BrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Lamb v. UlrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Howard v. RichardsNevada Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Weston v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. DelayNevada Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Watkins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Agway, Inc. v. ErnstSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Dulberg v. ZankelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API