Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Ulrich

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1923No. 14342PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, 0.

This action was commenced in the district court of Darter county, Okla., by Bernard Dirich, receiver for the State National Bank of Ardmore, Okla., defendant in error, plaintiff below, against J. A. Lamb, C. E. Murphy, and A. B. Murphy, plaintiffs in error, defendants below, for recovery of notes and securities, claimed by him as receiver 'for the bank in. ¡th,e, sum of. $10,008.95,

' The" parties "will be referred to as plain*.tiff anil defendants; ais they appeared,nip, the' lower court, " .

The petition alleges, in substance, that-the’-plaintiff;, was -receiver for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. HillUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
  2. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. MittendorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Rose v. Woldert Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Hayden v. Chemical Nat. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  5. Mason v. SloneckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hynds v. City of Ada Ex Rel. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Gourley v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Thompson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Lewis v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API