Legal Opinion
Lansing v. Board of Education
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1935No. Civ. 9736PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment made and entered upon an order of the court sustaining a demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandate. Among other things, it is alleged in the petition that there are now in the employ of the city and county of San Francisco, as members of or employees of the school department or as employees of the Board of Education or employees of the school district, 111 persons (giving their names and addresses) who reside outside of the limits of the city and county, in violation of section 7 of its charter, as amended in 1932 and ratified by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Esberg v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Ward v. San Diego School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Gould v. Santa Ana High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People Ex Rel. Davidson v. MertzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Brown v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Board of Trustees v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Berkeley Unified School Dist. of Alameda County v. James I. Barnes Const. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Madsen v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975