People Ex Rel. Davidson v. Mertz
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, challenging the validity of defendant’s position as a member of the board of education of the city of Los Angeles. Defendant was elected June 6, 1933, at an election held within the Los Angeles City High School District, took office, and acted as a member of the board until this action was filed on June 29, 1933. Section 307 of the charter of the city provides that no person shall be eligible for said office unless he has been a resident of the city for at least two years preceding his nomination or election. Defendant had not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gerth v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Kelso v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lansing v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Mertz v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.