Legal Opinion
United States v. Ceraso
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 26, 1973No. Crim. 14927PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
Defendants Frank Casale, Joseph M. Casale and Lloyd Bosch have moved to suppress evidence derived from a wiretap conducted in February, 1971. Their motion is based on two unusual circumstances in this case: an unsigned order of authorization for a prior wiretap, and a possibility that the prior tap may have impermissibly tainted the February, 1971 tap. Although the court agrees with Defendants that’ the prior tap was illegal, their motion will be denied because they have not proven that the February, 1971 tap was a product of that illegality. The court will deny…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Isaac L. James, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Eric J. Moore Craig C. Robinson Ray L. Williams Keith L. Cooks Lashonda R. Robinson Sherice Y. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. CarubiaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- United States v. CarusoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.