Legal Opinion

Rugendorf v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1964No. 223PublishedCited by 721 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Following a trial by jury, petitioner was convicted of violating 18 U. S. C. § 2315 1 by knowingly receiving, concealing and storing 81 stolen fur pieces, the fur pieces having been transported in interstate commerce and having a value exceeding $5,000. The Court of Appeals sustained the conviction despite petitioner's objections that the evidence was not sufficient to support the verdict; that the fur garments should have been excluded from evidence because they were seized on the authority of a search warrant supported by a deficient affidavit; and that the names of certain confidential…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. Sam Pearce and Harold HadesmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by721 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971

716 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API