Legal Opinion
United States v. Caruso
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 1, 1976No. 75 CR 1157(MP)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
The defendants have moved to suppress the fruits of state and federal wiretaps obtained pursuant to eight state and three federal orders essentially on the grounds that the state tapes were not sealed “immediately” upon the termination of the taps and that the federal taps were derived from the state taps. The claim is also made that the affidavits submitted by an FBI agent as part of the government’s application for the three federal taps were insufficient to authorize the use of wiretaps as an investigative technique and that other traditional means were…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. ArmocidaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. FeolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- United States v. Antonio Cruz Vazquez, Benito Luis Cortina, Antonio Gonzalez, Andres Rene Rappard, and Jose De La Fe-QuintasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Joseph Massino, A/K/A "Joey", Salvatore Vitale, A/K/A "Sally"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. MoraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.