Legal Opinion
Structural Associates, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 3, 2009No. 09-372CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
Plaintiff, SAI/Comfort, a joint venture between Structural Associates, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA (Syracuse), is a disappointed bidder in a procurement for the design and construction of military bar*738racks for the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps” or “the agency”). Following the selection of three contractors in the initial phase of a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (“MATOC”), plaintiff now seeks to enjoin the performance of those task orders on the ground that the agency failed to conduct meaningful discussions, erroneously downgraded an element of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- D & S Consultants, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Standard Communications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Dynamic Systems Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.