Legal Opinion
Martel v. CITY OF NEWTON, KAN.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 20, 1998No. 97-1202-JTMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
The present case arose after the City of Newton, Kansas commenced a civil action in Harvey County District Court to enforce anti-nuisance ordinances against Samuel and Blanche Froelich. Plaintiff Dan Martel states that he was in the business of purchasing and refurbishing real property, and. that he had an expectation of buying and selling property of the Froelichs. Martel contends that the City commenced its action against the Froelichs without probable cause and to harass Ms. Froelich. Martel contends the action constitutes a tort of outrage,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swanson v. BixlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bash v. City of Galena, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Froelich v. CITY OF NEWTON, KAN.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Martel v. City of Newton, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Canyon Park Business Center Owners' Association v. ButtigiegDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Julian III Flores v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.