Legal Opinion
Froelich v. CITY OF NEWTON, KAN.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 17, 1999No. 97-1368-WEBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 43). Both parties have submitted briefs on this motion. Oral arguments will not be beneficial or necessary for the disposition of this case.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case includes two federal claims and five state law tort claims which stem from the City of Newton’s pursuit of an injunction in the Harvey County district court against Sam and Blanche Froelich in a civil suit filed on August 28, 1996. Over a period of seven years, the Froelichs were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martel v. City of Newton, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999