Legal Opinion
Martel v. City of Newton, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 7, 1999No. 98-1391-JTMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
The present matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Dan Martel has brought various claims against the defendants arising from the condemnation of a certain property located in Newton, Kansas. The court has previously addressed the efforts of the City of Newton to enforce certain housing regulations in Martel v. City of Newton, 6 F.Supp.2d 1243 (D.Kan.1998). For the reasons stated herein, the court will grant the relief requested by defendants.
Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings, depositions, answers…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rios v. AguirreDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003