Legal Opinion
Mardirossian v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 18, 2006No. CV 05-02871 MMMJCXPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
MORROW, District Judge.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On April 19, 2005, plaintiff Robert Mar-dirossian filed this action against The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Hirsch Pipe and Supply Co., Inc. Long Term Disability Plan, Hirsch Pipe and Supply Co., Inc. Medical Plan, Hirsch Pipe and Supply Co., Inc. Life Insurance Plan, and Hirsch Pipe and Supply Co., Inc. Pension/Retirement Plan. 1 Mardirossian challenged the denial of his claim for long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under an employee…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colby v. Assurant Employee BenefitsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Harlow v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- McAfee v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Autec Power, Inc. v. Vencient BarnesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Biotronik, Inc. v. FryDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.